ARSHAD ALI versus CIVIL JUDGE IST CLASS-CUM-RENT CONTROLLER, MULTAN
Sections 13 and 14 Civil Procedure Code (V8 of 1908), O VII, R 11 and O XVII, R 3 Withdrawal Requirement 18 months for rent payments by the tenant and the landlord's personal requirement. And the failure to present evidence for the same reason on the request of the landlord and the other side of the tenant, in the absence of a landlord's relationship under the tenant O XVII, R 3, CPC, between the parties. Excludes an application that claims to be due for that reason. A 24-month application by the tenant under O VII, R 11, CPC was challenged in an appeal seeking rejection of a second judicial decision, which was granted by the appellate authority controlling the unqualified rental. Was excluded because of At its discretion may adopt the CPC procedure, which does not apply to the rental process, the order of dismissal of an approved termination application by applying the provisions of O. XVI, R 3, CPC is not mentioned. The West Pakistan Civil Rent Restriction may, in accordance with the provisions of Section 14 of the Ordinance 1959, briefly reject the rent controller's application for withdrawal, if the grounds mentioned in section 13 (2) (3) are raised. , It was finally decided that the words finally decided to use the section 14 of the ordinance to finalize the inquiry after the recording of the evidence on the merit Shall mean that the Rent Controller had dismissed the earlier evacuation request on technical grounds without any inquiry and did not exclude two such grounds. Thus, the terms of section 11, CPC were not barred, and Under CPI, CPC West
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
