AHSAN SULEMAN versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, LAHORE
Section 5 and 17 Rules of the West Pakistan Family Courts, 1965, Rr 5 and 6 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908) Section 16 and 20 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Petition for the Dover Recovery of Sections 16 and 20, CPC Scope Husband (Applicant) Application for Return of Wife's Claim Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction of the Family Court; Simultaneous Legislation of Rule 6 of the West Pakistan Family Courts Rules, Rules, 1965 was rejected. Where it was clear that where the cause of action arose, in whole or in part, the court of the place would have special jurisdiction to File a lawsuit before Section 17 of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964. Articles 16 and 20 of the CPC should not be taken into account especially when the provisions of section 5 of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964 and the provisions of sections 5 and 6 were included in the special law. Was. The rules of the West Pakistan Family Courts, 1965, constitute jurisdiction in relation to the determination of jurisdiction of the Family Court and in the presence of such provisions, the provisions of common law should not be taken into account, dismissing the constitutional application. Gone \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
