Section 5, Schedule and Section 17 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 11 Maintaining a Divorced Daughter's Care Case Against Your Father Retains a daughter's rehabilitation claim against her father that the daughter's other for rehabilitation The trial was stopped by Race Josta. In the earlier suit, the claimed past restoration period was six years, while in the second / current case, the family court had a five-year merit not decided on the first case, but on technical or preliminary grounds because of the need for jurisdiction. The case was dismissed. The judiciary will not apply when the merits of the first case have not been decided, the Family Court has exclusive jurisdiction to admit all claims without restitution. There is no jurisdiction to exclude a daughter's restitution claim against her father. Was unable to disregard the invalid order was r father n Such request of the father was rejected
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
