Find a Lawyer

WAHEED MURAD ALIAS SHEIKHA versus STATE

The testimony of Section 6 R6 rape testimony was not substantiated by any other evidence that the evidence of the complainant girl was corroborated and the statements of the deceased witnesses contradicted each other as stated in the report on semen and clothing. Is. The victim, who was sent to him for blood grouping, was not brought on record by the prosecution but the victim's broken bangles found by the investigating officer were not presented to court \ knife / allegedly recovered from the suspect, Although it was presented to the court, the facts and circumstances of the case had no significant value. According to the record, there was no evidence to prove that the accused was acquitted to prove the accused's guilt. \ R \ n

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012

• ARSHAD PETER v. Mst. SHUMAILA 2012 PLD 430
• SHAHID IQBAL v. State 2012 MLD 430
• UMAR AFZAL v. SPECIAL JUDGE, ANTI-TERRORISM COURT NO.2, RAWALPINDI 2012 PLD 433
• MUHAMMAD LIAQAT v. State 2012 YLR 436
• MUHAMMAD NAZIR v. MUHAMMAD YOUSAF 2012 MLD 439
• AMIR AFTAB HUSSAIN v. LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR, PUNJAB PROVINCIAL HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT, RAWALPINDI 2012 PLD 440
• MUHAMMAD NADEEM v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, BHAKKAR 2012 CLC 441
• MUHAMMAD SADIQ v. State 2012 PCrLJ 444

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2012 →

top civil advocates from Samma Satta lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes