MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KABIRWALA, DISTRICT KHANEWAL
Section 199 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Sections 1904 and 561 A Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Section 324/148/149 Attempts to commit a murderous Ummah, armed riot with deadly weapons, petitioner reviewed by session judge. An approved questionnaire order was summoned and an order approved by the magistrate under which both the local police and the RIB rejected the applicant's request for a lawsuit, after which the known It is reported that the defendants are innocent and not affiliated with them. The impact of this crime was not binding on the Police Reports Commission in the lower courts and they could pass orders for proceedings without recording evidence if they showed the content contained in the report under Section 7373, CRPC. That the defendants were affiliates. With the commission of the crime, both the courts below found that during the period of the charge, after the indictment, the applicant had not raised any complaint about the keeping of the respondents in column no. 2. Neither prayed for prosecution nor effective treatment was available to the applicant in the event of a private complaint and could benefit from the same session judge. It has been observed that the opinion of the police is not binding on the courts but it cannot be ignored immediately if it has been made for good reason. The impeachment orders passed by the following courts were not subject to any illegal activity and the impairment request was dismissed under circumstances \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
