Find a Lawyer

SHAHID versus STATE

Section 7 337A (i) Definition of evidence played an important role in the cause of the scholars and caliphs and brought the destiny of this case to its logical end, the incident took place in the month of August and this evening at 30 o'clock There was no 30 minutes when the light would fade and the attackers were difficult to identify. The case of the accused was related to the accused who were sentenced to death. It was alleged that he was armed with Swatas and there were cases of trial witnesses testifying against the injured. Keeping in mind the suspects and the rule of incarceration, the accused was reduced to a reduced term. Under the circumstances

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012

• MUHAMMAD RAMZAN v. SHAMAS-UD-DIN 2012 CLC 1541
• JAM MUHAMMAD ISMAIL v. JAM BAHAWAL 2012 MLD 1545
• BASHIR AHMED v. SKYLINE LAHORE (PVT.) COMPANY through Chief Executive 2012 CLC 1546
• MUHAMMAD ZAFAR v. THE STATE 2012 PCrLJ 1549
• MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN v. Malik ALLAH YAR KHAN 2012 CLD 1550
• IMAM DIN v. ISHAQ AHMAD 2012 MLD 1559
• GHULAM MUSTAFA v. PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Chief Secretary 2012 CLC 1565
• MUHAMMAD AHSAN BHUTTA v. VICE-CHANCELLOR, BAHAUDDIN ZAKARIYA UNIVERSITY, MULTAN 2012 YLR 1565

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2012 →

how to become a advocate from Lawrence pur lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes