Appeals against the accused from Section 7 Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302 and 308 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Section 417 (2A) were dismissed under Section 302, PPC, But he was convicted under Section 308, PPC. And Dait and sentenced to 14 years imprisonment because the businessman is not liable to the accused as the accused under section 302 (a), PPC, the provisions of section 308, PPC. The matter was not addressed when the minority was not prosecuted by the accused. During the trial and only in his defense, he had submitted a copy of the registration of the birth records and had to rely on the same trial court as the juvenile convicted him under Section 308, the accused under PPC. The source had a special request to the minority court to dismiss it and, similarly, it was held that the High Court observed that whenever a question regarding age arises or arises in a case. If so, courts should not deal with it in a superficial or slip way. But should proceed, an inquiry was ordered under the provisions of section 7 of the Judicial Justice System Ordinance 2000, which did not include a medical examination by a permanently constituted Medical Board Trial Court. According to the law, they did not detect the minority of the accused nor provided any opportunity. The prosecution and the said ordinance did not deal with the case in accordance with the provisions of the accused to refute the accused's claim even though it was alleged that he had already undergone imprisonment and had been charged with murder.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
