CH. SUNEEL SHAMSHAD AHMED versus DIRECTOR-GENERAL, NAB PUNJAB, LAHORE
Section 25 (b) the applicant was found guilty of dealing with the object of voluntary withdrawal and bargaining of the application, and in a reference the conviction was sentenced by the court and the accused voluntarily returned the money. , And it sought approval of his plea bargain and voluntary return. The Additional Deputy Prosecutor General, NAB through Section 25 (b) of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, disclosed that when the trial is pending, the trial court will approve the above and if the appeal is pending. Then this option will be rejected. Appellate Court When no appeal was pending, whether it was not filed or decided, the court will be competent in the trial court only in the present case, the accused applicant did not file an appeal from the chairman NAB trial court. Refer to Under Section 25 (b) of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, the accused was obliged to approve the contract for the office's objection request. Accordingly disposed of
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
