Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MST. ROZEENA KHATTAK versus RAJA ABDUL RASHEED


Articles 5 and 17 of the Martyrdom (February 10, 1984), Arts 129 (G) and 79 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Petition suit in which the declaration on the basis of the agreement in favor of the wife at the time of the reclamation and title of the articles of the dowry Is gone The marriage suit of the wife (petitioner) was pronounced by the trial court and the appellate court set aside the trial court's order to the extent of the declaration of title in favor of the wife. The wife's confession was that the husband had given the suit land gift at the time of marriage, in addition to the money of the dover, and such fact was also included in the marriage contract, besides, the transfer of the land in favor of the wife. The marriage contract was written for, according to his own version, the person mentioned. Of legal proceedings, but did not present it before the trial court under Article 129 (g) of the 1984 Convention, a negative signal would be drawn to the effect that it was deliberately concealed and understood. The same thing was prepared as a will, and the wife's dispute, therefore, proved that the husband admitted the contents of the said work to the extent of admission about the amount of the Dover, while the remainder was refused, before the aforesaid proceedings. Husband's signature was present on the page. Where the entire contract was concluded, the wife submitted to the applicant, who confirmed to the defendant the issuance of the stamp paper, the signatures and documents on the register as well as the stamp paper were more than available. The marriage contract was similar, and both documents were not rejected by the husband. The appellate court did not appreciate the procedure which was explicitly mentioned in a separate column in the marriage contract, and in particular

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
Pakistan, top advocate family court from Sambrial lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.