Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

PIR MUHAMMAD versus THE DISTRICT MANAGER, GOVERNMENT TRANSPORT SERVICE, HYDERABAD AND ANOTHER


Practitioner's Party Demanding Delays Due to His Wife's Serious Disease Due to Her Attendance

1970 P L C 158

[Industrial Appellate Tribunal West Pakistan]

Present: Inamullah Khan, Appellate Tribunal

PIR MUHAMMAD

Versus

THE DISTRICT MANAGER, GOVERNMENT TRANSPORT SERVICE, HYDERABAD AND ANOTHER

Appeal No. HYD: 39 of 1968, heard on 17th February 1969.

Industrial dispute

--‑Practice ‑Party's representative praying adjournment for his inability to attend due to wife's serious illness‑Court receiving such request after orders passed in case Court, in circumstances, held, though could not adjourn, decision nevertheless set aside and case remanded for hearing arguments of representative of such party‑West Pakistan Industrial Disputes Ordinance (IV of 1968), S. 16.

Wasihullah Qureshi for Appellant.

Sirajul Haq Qureshi for Respondent No. 1.

Date of hearing: 17th February 1969.

ORDER

This is an appeal under section 16 of the West Pakistan Industrial Dispute Ordinance, 1968, against an order of the learned Chairman of the Second West Pakistan Industrial Court; Karachi, dated 24th June 1968, on an application under section 30 (2) of the Industrial Disputes Ordinance, 1959. It is not necessary for the disposal of this appeal to give the facts of the case in view of the contention of Mr. Wasihullah Qureshl. The learned Representative for the appellant.

2. Mr. Wasihullah Qureshi contended that on 24th June 1968. his wife seriously fell ill and he asked for adjournment of the ,;con that ground. He sent a telegram to the learned Chairman at 9‑45 a.m. from Hyderabad. The learned Chairman of the Industrial Court received the telegram, as would appear from his endorsement on the telegram, at about 1‑20 p. m. The endorsement of the Chairman. on that telegram is as under :‑

"Received after the order passed. File."

3. It appears from the order sheet of the learned Court of 24th June 1968, that Mr. Mahboob Rizvi for the applicants (respondent No. 1, before this Court) filed his arguments and the case was cst rved for decision. It, however, appears from the order sheet of the Court of the same date that the learned Chairman changed his mind and dictated the order on the same date and pronounced it on the same date.

4. I would accept the endorsement of the learned Chairman of the Industrial Court that he received the telegram after he had passed the order, He could not, therefore, adjourn the cage am, however, sat is he i that the wife of Mr. Wasihullah Qureshi, was seriously ill on 24th June 1968, and he, therefore, could not leave her alone at Hyderabad and come to Karachi. I would,' therefore, set aside; decision of the learned Chairman date rd 24th June 1968, and remand the case for bearing the arguments of the learned Representatives of the parties before disposing on the matter

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
power of attorney advocate Kalar Syedian lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.