Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUZAFFAR KHAN versus THE DISTRICT MANAGER, GOVERNMENT TRANS PORT SERVICE, RAWALPINDI


Read with Section 16 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Section 5 Appeals! delay Appeal filed before the High Court before the setting up of the Industrial Appellate Tribunal High Court was dismissed on the basis of its submission to the Industrial Appellate Tribunal, which was constituted till then. One month after the appellant was dismissed by the High Court, the appellant filed an appeal before the tribunal and also prayed for the late condolences under section 5, the Limitation Act, 1908, as there was no explanation. Given why the appeal was not filed before the appellate tribunal after its dismissal by the High Court? Appeal dismissed over time
1970 P L C 142

[Industrial Appellate Tribunal West Pakistan]

Present: Inamullah Khan, Appellate Tribunal

MUZAFFAR KHAN

Versus

THE DISTRICT MANAGER, GOVERNMENT TRANS PORT SERVICE, RAWALPINDI

Appeal No. Rl.‑159 of 1969, decided on 3rd October 1969.

West Pakistan Industrial Disputes Ordinance (IV of 1968),

---S. 16 read with Limitation Act (IX of 1908), S. 5 ‑Appeal ' of delay‑Appeal filed before High Court prior to constitution of Industrial Appellate Tribunal ‑ High Court dismissing appeal on ground that it lay to Industrial Appellate Tribunal which was by that time constituted‑ Appellant filing appeal before Appellate Tribunal‑‑after one month of its dismissal by High Court and also praying for condonation of delay under S. 5, Limitation Act, 1908‑No explanation given as to why appeal before Appellate Tribunal was not filed immediately after its dismissal by High Court‑Appeal dismissed as time-barred.

Appellant in person.

Naseerul Hasan for Respondent.

Date of hearing: 3rd October 1969.

ORDER

This is an application under section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay in filing the appeal. The award was given on the 6th of July 1968. , Thereafter there being no Appellate Tribunal 'at that time the appellant went to the High Court in writ petition. It was dismissed on the 3rd of March 1969, by the Division Bench on the ground that the appellant should have filed an appeal under section 16 to the appellate Tribunal. The appellant filed an appeal before this Court on the 3rd of April 1969. A perusal of the application under section 5 of the Limitation Act does not give any reason whatsoever as to why the applicant did not file the appeal immediately after the 3rd of March 1968. In this connection I may mention that an appeal has to be file within 30 days of the decision of the Industrial Court. The appellant applied for a copy of the order of the Industrial Court on the 18th of March 1969. This fact would disclose that the appellant had no intention to file an appeal to this Court. In these circumstances, I see no reason to condone this delay. The application is dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
tax advocates from Bhan Saeedabad lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.