Section 13, Plaintiffs Plaintiffs Claiming Pre-Stakeholder Claims Based on Shared Partnerships, Conventions, Facilities, and Appendices, Sue was filed for pre-trial notice, but on appeal, the appeal below The court set aside the verdict and order. On obtaining information about the trial court and defendant / property sale transaction in favor of the defendants, the plaintiffs 'legal status dismissed the claimants' claims, demanded a leap there and then Student Aid Notice And in the course of time the lawsuit claimed the highest right of pre-emption right after their suit, the plaintiffs claimed the pre-discrimination right in relation to the suit property on the basis of joint partnership and harmony, Whereas Defendant / Vendor failed to prove such qualification, after analyzing the evidence, the trial court's record in favor of the available promoters was inadmissible, which the appellate court had erroneously and illegally. But the appellate court's order was set aside and the trial court's case was restored.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
