The prosecution established the presence of the suspect in the drug-carrying vehicle, which led to a lengthy investigation into the police officer who stopped the police, as defined in Section 9 (c) drug possession and trafficking evidence. But nothing was squeezed out of his mouth to disperse the prosecution's case; contradictions were important in the statements of the prosecution's witnesses, and they were not known in the prosecution's case in nature. , Confirmed and confirmed the vehicle obtained from secret cavities; they also confirmed the arrest of the accused on the spot. The witness said that the witness was subjected to a lengthy investigation, but nothing was extracted to the benefit of the accused, a huge quantity of 22kg of hashish was recovered from the car's secret caves, directly to the accused. Palia was in control and for reasons of impeachment such as the defendant presented during the trial, a sensible mind was not appealing to the Investigation Officer, she had full support and confirmation of the sender and the forensic science The laboratory's positive report was dropped, no doubt to prove the culprits of the accused, 22 from the vehicle by prosecutor's witnesses No material contradictions or contradictions were found regarding the recovery of kilograms of marijuana, for which the suspects were being sent to the Franzic Science Laboratory to send samples late. In the absence of objection to the chemical test, the fly could not be treated as deadly. No link was found between the accused and the co-accused for tampering with the N, with the co-accused sitting on the front seat of the vehicle. See the wind
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
