In section Q 42 of the Qanun Shahadat (1984, of 1984), the suit sued by the claimants in the Su 64 suit claimed to have killed the deceased in 1946. His widow, who was later gifted to the defendant in 1966 and the case challenging such a gift, was dismissed in 1977. Valdetti did not deny that the plaintiff, who was one of the defendants present in the present case, also appeared. In challenging such a gift and in its statement the deceased of 1905 06 and 1950 51, or any connection with his widow / donor pedigree table, denied that the plaintiff was not a successor in the interests of the deceased. The inclusion of the plaintiff's predecessor in the prescription table was not certified by evidence under Article 64 of the Martyrdom of Law in 1991; the 1984 suit was dismissed in circumstances \ r \ n
