ABDUL KHALIQ (DECEASED) versus CH. REHMAT ALI (DECEASED)
Section 21 pre-emption suit disputes the superior right, the affirmative anonymous transaction-proof suit filed by the pre-importer was affirmed by the court but the lower appellate court allowed the appeal and denied the jurisdiction of the appeal. The High Court dismissed the case. The judgment and decree restored by the trial of the Lower Appellate Court through trial and trial, which Waltetti Wendy as the original owner of the suit land registered in honor of the real estate 30 197 1978 , Which resulted in a dispute between the shopkeeper and the landlord. Such an award was resolved by award, followed by a decree of the Civil Court dated 1982-1982, which was implemented on 23 2 1982 through a change of registration, all such events being prematurely settled. Before claiming nine or filing for pre-arrest. The pre-emptor's application to the pre-emptor, 172 1983, was also quite silent in this regard, therefore, it cannot be said that it was a collective and fraudulent case between the shopkeeper and the proprietor. There were, in my judgment of the Empire Lower Appellate Court, defeating the claim of the preceding copyright, the proper and proper reasons have been assigned to prevent the date of the change of registration in the history. In 1982, according to the registered cell deed, only half of the suit land was not charged with any right of the importer before the affidavit was filed, but the High Court recorded any offender and the lower appellate court Results advertisement
