Section 100/302 (b) / 148/149 Right to Private Defense, Alleged, Arrested with Deadly Weapons, Evidence of Illegal Assembly Evidence: Right of Private Defense of the Body Who Causes Death to Defendant It was alleged that he killed the victim due to a property dispute and aerial shootings with the accomplices, resulting in injuries to several prosecution witnesses. The conviction of the accused was that the complaining party tried to forcibly take over the disputed property. And started having his wife. The daughters, therefore, fired at the victim while exercising his right to self-defense. That the evidence on the basis of which he was convicted and sentenced was denied the participation of the co-accused. That the prosecution has failed to prove the motion against the accused, and that witnesses have improved the hearing during the trial and that other persons came to the suspect's house and there was a confrontation between the parties, but no evidence of this. Not Found. The complaining party was fully armed and came home to cause trouble. Only the complaining party was accused of arriving at the scene to occupy the disputed property and the victim's wife and daughters. The accused has not come under the purview of Section 100, PPC, as no evidence has come on the record that the complaining party was fully armed to cause trouble. And none of the women folk or women who were allegedly beaten up by the complaining party. During the investigation, all witnesses testified that despite the long distance examination
