MIR HAMAYUN AZIZ KURD versus PROVINCIAL ELECTION COMMISSIONER, BALOCHISTAN
Section 14 (5), 78 (3) (d), 82 and 99 Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 62 and 63 Corruption Practices for Disqualification of Nomination Possession False statement Degree of nomination of your papers by exception of criminal court But the provocation was raised by the Returning Officer, Pillai, that he had been acquitted by the criminal court in the case of possessing a fake education degree, just because the appellant was acquitted of a criminal court, does not mean that he is a graduate. Was not authorized to give a degree in a criminal court or to decide whether to admit a degree in Pakistan or not. Oh. It was the only recognized institution, namely the Higher Education Commission, which could determine legality or, in the case of another degree, anybody could attend a college or university, which was not recognized by the Higher Education Commission, and under such circumstances. , Such a person could not describe this paper. In his possession, Pakistan had a "graduation" degree, otherwise the criminal courts under its jurisdiction had the jurisdiction to identify degrees, affiliate to colleges / universities, equality or, to a lesser extent, a degree. He had no jurisdiction, nor did he have the requisite expertise of the appellant, stating that the degree was a degree which was acknowledged in Pakistan and was misrepresented. Or a false or false declaration was made in relation to his / her qualifying academic qualification as amended by declaring / submitting a false representation in respect of his / her educational question as section (78 (3) (d) of the Public Representation Act, 1976). And similar corruption, for which moisture
Related judgments — Election Tribunal Balochistan, 2013
