Section 5, Schedule Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Petition for Restitution Allowance and Dwyer Receipt was ordered that it stated before the Family Court that on the night of the marriage the wife was paid a Dwyer, Therefore, the disclosures could not be considered before the Family Court as proof of the payment of the dorms before the courts were a statement of invalidity and the husband was obliged to prove the same through the evidence, in the absence of compelling evidence. The statement cannot be construed as proof, and in such a case, the wife refuses to dismiss her husband's claim. In fact, if the Dover had not paid the debt against the husband, the wife would have the right to refuse to perform the marital duties once. It turned out that the door was not paid, the wife would be entitled to stay away from the husband and the husband would be obligated to take care of the husband. In the present case, he did not prove that he had paid his wife. Therefore, the wife was entitled to receive a restitution allowance according to which the constitutional application was dismissed.
