Find a Lawyer

SYED A.S. SHAH versus UNIVERSITY OF THE PUNJAB

The Arts 199 and 3 Constitution Petitioner could not submit their summaries due to the absence of a Research Supervisor as a Fundamental Rights Petitioner PhD Research Scholar, but were told that the Advanced Studies and Research Board had only applied for it in the PhD program. The applicant's argument that permission to re-register was that it could not be bothered by the mistake made by the University authorities, which led to the approval of the applicants' names by the University Officials of the property. Department Doctoral Program Committee Recommends Dean of Faculty Suitable for PhD degree studies with the name of the Word of Studies / Faculty Council found that the thesis title / symbol and the name of the Research Supervisor were to be approved within one year after the applicant's enrollment. ? The doctoral program committee nominated research supervisor neither the applicant nor the title / symbol was approved by the competent authority; in such a situation no negative indication can be raised against the applicant, but the slow behavior of the university / college authorities And unhelpful behavior should demand drastic action against the applicant. The premises presented by him were subject to the signature of the research supervisor but no legal blanket could be given when no research supervisor was nominated by the authorities then the summary submitted by the applicant. But there was no question about the consent of the research supervisor. University / College officials assign responsibility for nomination of research supervisor

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015

• NAWAB-UD-DIN SAINGAL v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE 2015 YLR 1674
• ARSHAD MEHMOOD v. ABDUL HAQ 2015 YLR 1690
• MUHAMMAD AFZAL v. State 2015 YLR 1699
• DISTRICT HEADMASTERS/PRINCIPALS ASSOCIATION DISTRICT MULTAN v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Finance, Islamabad 2015 PTD 1714
• ABDUL RAZZAQ v. ABDUL SATTAR 2015 YLR 1749
• GULL ARZOO v. STATION HOUSE OFFICER BZ, DISTRICT, MULTAN 2015 YLR 1765
• COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE v. Sheikh MANZOOR AHMAD 2015 PTD 1771
• Syed MUNEEB AHMED SHAH v. ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR 2015 YLR 1774

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2015 →

top advocate from Akhora Khattak lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes