Find a Lawyer

PIR HAIDER ZAMAN QURESHI versus PIR MUHAMMAD ASLAM BODLA

Sections 22 & and the QQ Law Evidence (of 1984 of the Ten), Arts 117 and 120 Elections Commission suspended on corruption and illegal practice for proving Pattenshire a unsuccessful candidate and for failing candidate misuse. During the election process, they were not complained of any irregularities or any kind of fraud. The applicant, in his evidence, did not make any specific allegations of corruption and illegal practice during the polling process, but the returning candidate was cross-examined at length but there was nothing important and material. The applicant's allegations can be substantiated to prove a realistic dispute over corruption and illegal practices during the election / polling process. Under the circumstances

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015

• GULL ARZOO v. STATION HOUSE OFFICER BZ, DISTRICT, MULTAN 2015 YLR 1765
• COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE v. Sheikh MANZOOR AHMAD 2015 PTD 1771
• Syed MUNEEB AHMED SHAH v. ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR 2015 YLR 1774
• FATIMA BIBI v. MUHAMMAD HANIF 2015 YLR 1789
• RASOOL BAKHSH v. MUHAMMAD YAQOOB 2015 YLR 1800
• GHULAM YASIN KHAN v. State 2015 YLR 1810
• Mrs. AMINA NAEEM v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2015 PTD 1815
• COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE v. MUHAMMAD SHAFIQUE 2015 PTD 1823

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2015 →

criminal advocate from Killa Abdullah lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes