Find a Lawyer

I.M. STEEL INDUSTRIES, LAHORE versus C.I.R., ZONE-IV RTO, LAHORE

Section 21 (2) De-registration, blacklisting and suspension of registration Blacklisting had dealt with the Appellate Tribunal after the suspension of registration and the appeal was dealt with under which the order of suspension was granted and its The latter action was argued by taxpayers as an order to collect revenue. The first suspension was passed in pursuance of the order, which covers the meaning of the term quent followed by the proceedings used by the appellate tribunal in its order. And the blacklisting order should be declared illegal, which will result in the registration being restored. The validity of the illegal basis had to break the edifice, the appellate tribunal had already declared the suspension of the entry illegal, the blacklist after the suspension of the registration was to fulfill its destiny. Dismissed and ordered by appellate tribunal \ r \ n

Related judgments — Inland, 2013

• RICE EXPORTERS ASSOCIATION OF PAKISTAN (REAP), LAHORE v. COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-II, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, LAHORE 2013 PTD 1764
• SECCO PAK (PVT.) LTD., LAHORE v. CIR (APPEAL-II), RTO, LAHORE 2013 PTD 1773
• GUJRAT PRE-CASTING INDUSTRIES, GUJRAT v. C.I.R. (ZONE-II), RTO., SIALKOT 2013 PTD 1796
• MAPLE LEAF CEMENT FACTORY LTD., LAHORE v. COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX, FAISALABAD 2013 PTD 1800
• JARIT INTERNATIONAL, SIALKOT v. COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, GUJRANWALA 2013 PTD 1953
• SIDDIQUE ENTERPRISES, FAISALABAD v. C.I.R. (APPEALS), R.T.O. FAISALABAD 2013 PTD 2130
• PAK ARAB FERTILIZERS LTD. LAHORE v. C.I.R. ZONE-II, R.T.O., MULTAN 2013 PTD 2148
• ARMY WELFARE TRUST - NIZAMPUR CEMENT PLANT, RAWALPINDI v. COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LTU, ISLAMABAD 2013 PTD 2174

All Inland judgments of 2013 →

top advocates from Kech lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes