Find a Lawyer

AHMAD NASEEM versus NAUMAN ZAFFAR

Section 17 Eviction Request As a personal need testimony of the premises by the landlord, the approval of the landlord's lawyer is not required for the landlord to appear in the testimonial, but on the basis of some kind of personal need Check with your lawyer to prove this. The tenant's lawyer had long examined the landlord's lawyer, but did not raise any question about his appointment as a lawyer, but there was nothing in the record that included the landlord's lawyer. The presence was due to the tenant because the witness had objected to the tenant's circumstances

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013

• COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-III, KARACHI v. GENERAL TYRE AND RUBBER CO. OF PAKISTAN LTD., KARACHI 2013 PTD 387
• COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS v. QASIM INTERNATIONAL CONTAINER TERMINAL (PAK) LTD. 2013 PTD 392
• SECTIONS 284 TO 288 OF THE COMPANIES ORDINANCE, 1984 2013 CLD 397
• SIRAJ v. State 2013 PCrLJ 398
• Mst. SHIRIN BEGUM v. VIITH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, KARACHI SOUTH 2013 MLD 398
• Syed NAZIM HUSSAIN ZAIDI v. IVTH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, KARACHI 2013 YLR 400
• NAWAB AHMED KHANZADA v. AUTHORITY UNDER PAYMENT OF WAGES ACT, 1934 AND COMMISSIONER WORKMEN\'S COMPENSATION FOR HYDERABAD 2013 PLC 402
• AZIZ AHMED v. HAKIMZADI 2013 CLC 406

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2013 →

law firms from Usta Mohammad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes