Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE versus ABDUL REHMAN

Section 115 of the Specific Relief Act (Constitution of 1877), Sections 12 and 54 were jurisdictional to both courts in that the High Court generally did not proceed beyond the concurrent searches of the facts listed by the courts below. Is not displayed. That the evidence was misleading, was clearly against the evidence, or that it is impossible that its approval under Article 115 of the CPC would amount to serious misconduct under the jurisdiction of the High Court. The finding of the two lower courts was based on the correct definition of the evidence. The civil review request was dismissed

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013

• ARBELO v. State 2013 PCrLJ 1155
• MUHAMMAD YOUSAF KHAN BUGTI v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Senior Member, Board of Revenue 2013 CLC 1155
• MUSHTAQUE AHMED v. State 2013 YLR 1158
• NAIMAT KHAN v. State 2013 PCrLJ 1162
• ATIF MANZOOR v. FAYSAL BANK LIMITED 2013 CLD 1165
• YOUSUF KHAN v. State 2013 YLR 1168
• ABDUL RAHEEM KHAN v. NAZAKAT HUSSAIN 2013 MLD 1170
• MUMTAZ ALI v. State 2013 YLR 1178

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2013 →

top advocates from Jamshoro lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes