Section 516 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Request for Vehicle Superannuation, claiming dismissal of Vehicle as its last owner and consequently, the aggrieved buyer accused, after delivering a fake pay order to the respondent. The vehicle in question was purchased and the police subsequently confiscated the same petitioner, police said, adding that the police had filed a Superintendent of Vehicle in connection with the FIR filed against the accused against the accused. The claim was made but his claim was rejected after which the applicant filed a complaint with the following court. The Webro filed petition was reviewed. It was also denied and the possession of the vehicle was handed over to the respondents that the applicant said that the police recovered the vehicle from his possession, so, he came to the last owner's circle, Both the defendants and the defendants were apparently deceived. The accused vehicle registration document T he did not provide a copy of the suspect's Computerized National Identification Card (CNIC) in the name of the respondent's designated applicant. The important thing to consider was whether the vehicle was sold by its original owner to an accused involved in counterfeiting, fraud. And is dishonestly promoting the delivery of property and whether any such accused can sell the vehicle in such vehicle, the applicant has stated that the accused had sold the vehicle to him, which the defendant had The FIR listed was involved as an accused, therefore, the applicant did not comply. In the good buyer's jurisdiction the respondents finally got their laws
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
