Find a Lawyer

MAJ. (R) ALI MURAD versus MUHAMMAD KAMRAN

Appealing a Check Against the Failure of Section 489F Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Section 417 (2A), the accused acknowledged the issuance of the check and said that when the failure did not occur, he immediately called an employee. Paid cash on After the conclusion of the complainant's trial, the trial court acquitted the accused. This was done with dishonest intention. And the purpose of issuing the check should fulfill any obligation or pay the debt. The element of dishonesty intention was missing, so the crime was not completed. The witness's employee was not examined because the witness complained to Failed to prove out-of-court trial appeal dismissed

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013

• MUNEER AHMAD v. State 2013 YLR 1853
• ABDUL MATEEN v. SALMAN BUTT 2013 YLR 1863
• IRTIZA NISAR v. Dr. IRFAN TARIQ MIRZA 2013 MLD 1866
• BRECAST INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. v. HOUSE BUILDING FINANCE CORPORATION 2013 CLD 1867
• MUHAMMAD ALTAF v. State 2013 MLD 1876
• SHAHABUDDIN BARKAT ALI v. MUHAMMAD ADNAN 2013 YLR 1876
• EIDAN KHAN v. S.H.O. POLICE STATION KAMBHRA 2013 PCrLJ 1883
• AVM (R) S.J. RAZA v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN 2013 CLD 1886

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2013 →

criminal advocate from Bhalwal lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes