Find a Lawyer

COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS KARACHI versus HAJI ISMAIL CO.

Section 32 imports of documentary evidence, lack of appellate tribunal bill precisely concludes that original documents such as building materials were not provided to the customs authorities by the importers. That the importers provided photocopies of the billing bill, which were attached to the consignor / consignor's address marker, resulted in the identification of the correlation between the shipping bills and the shipment under dispute. Could not run The Ladding Bill, which dates back to the last year, showed consignments exported from the country K before the Ladding Bill was issued. Importers also failed to produce documentary evidence to show that the containers carrying the seal were exported from Country K to another country. The conclusion reached by the appellate tribunal was appropriate and accordingly the appeal was allowed accordingly.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2015

• ANJUM AQEEL KHAN v. NATIONAL POLICE FOUNDATION 2015 SCMR 1348
• AMEER REHMAN v. AMEER MUMTAZ 2015 SCMR 1373
• COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, KARACHI v. NAYA DAUR MOTORS (PVT.) LTD. 2015 SCMR 1376
• SUMMIT BANK LIMITED v. QASIM AND CO. through Muhammad Alam 2015 CLD 1377
• HYDERABAD CANTONMENT BOARD v. RAJ KUMAR 2015 SCMR 1385
• COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS (APPRAISEMENT), CUSTOMS HOUSE, KARACHI v. AKHTER HUSSAIN 2015 SCMR 1391
• MUHAMMAD SADIQ v. The STATE 2015 SCMR 1394
• Mst. RESHAM BIBI v. ALI MUHAMMAD 2015 SCMR 1398

All Supreme Court judgments of 2015 →

solicitors from FR Tank / DI Khan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes