versus STATE
The order relating to the absence of response to show cause notice on file on the earlier decision of the Assissee's obligation under Section 36 (1) of the Sales Tax Act 1990, made the absence of such reply. No reason was disclosed. The file record shows that the Adjudicating Officer had only considered the documents submitted by the Department. If the matter was being investigated, then the Adjudicating Officer was obliged to provide it by any party. Provide a last and last chance to keep your perspective on the record when matters are postponed. One excuse or another would not conclude that he had nothing to say in his defense. The impeachment order does not show that the tribunal had set aside the motion order to present the matter and its decision. The Adjunct Officer was remanded for. Investigate the truth of the allegations against the Assisi, after receiving a response to show cause notices and other documentary evidence presented by the parties and within a stipulated time \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Kahuta lawyer