Find a Lawyer

TAUSIFA MURTAZA versus SYED RAZI AHMED HASHMI

Sections 42 and 54 Karachi Building and Town Planning Regulations 2002, Regulation 17 3 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), OXXX, RR1 and 2 Interim Order Prohibition, after the protection of rights by the Interim Control Area Proof Single Judge The approval, on behalf of the plaintiff and the imposition of certain conditions, did not preclude the defendants from taking up their building; this was the case raised by the plaintiff, which was the area under the Transitional Control Area; therefore, the defendants could not take any construction there. Where she was claiming from where she claimed she was a claimant. One road, while the other end of the building was located on the second road, therefore, the building had two access to the main roads The provincial government is able to designate any specific area as an interim control area because it is prohibited to take up the multi-storeyed building. Should be there for the purpose. A notification that was not placed before the court that the defendants were not taking any constructions in any interim control area PL failed to identify any illegal interference or irregularity approved by the High Court single judge. Stayed, and did not seek intervention, the High Court's appeal was dismissed lawer from fb area from Jacobabad lawyer