SUMAIRA AWAN, SECRETARY GENERAL versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN
Sections 12 and 17 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (V 1898), Section 265K Environmental Hazards Environmental Protection Agency, were approved by the Government Plea Contractor Plea's responsibility for the construction project by a Government and Secretary Consultant Company. Environmental impact was assessed. Environment was specifically invited to the meetings of the Executive Committee of the Government of Pakistan National Economic Council (ECNIC), therefore, the Pakistan Environment Protection Act, 1997 was required, as it was a government project. It was not necessary for the contractor to acknowledge this. , Was not responsible for obtaining "no objection certificate" under section 12 of the Pakistan Environmental Protection Act, 1997, because the validity tribunal did not agree with the request made by the authorities, as certain provisions of the applicable law. Cannot be delayed by approving or approving something. Unlike other unlawful methods or procedures, such a procedure does not matter if it is more comprehensive and complete than what is required by certain applicable provisions of the law, especially to be done under the law. Should be specific and specific because the law providing for the default or required action of this Act cannot absolve itself of the responsibility of executing the contractor. Under the illegal act / project that the contracting entity was primarily obliged to comply with the provisions of the law. Every act of illegal work was considered as equally liable for fines as co-offenders, because the original supporter of the illegal work was deemed guilty by a third party.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate for immigration from Piplan lawyer