Section 497 Preamble Code (XLV of 1860), Rule 420 / 489F / 506 Fraudulently and dishonestly, improperly issuing checks, guaranteeing criminal threats, denial of checks issued on bail guarantees The complainant filed an FIR for misappropriation of funds against his employees, in which case the defendant intervened and initiated the refund, and consequently issued three checks to the complainant under a contract. According to which one of the complainant's employees was released on bail, however it was stated that the employee refused to sign the release agreement The complainant's convictions were that checks were issued by the accused on the basis of the difference in the signatures to guarantee and dishonesty, and the allegations of "withholding payment" were directed to his dishonesty. Had demonstrated clearly. It was alleged that the complainant's employee did not sign the contract in question after getting bail, so he was incomplete and not bound to the accused, and the charge against him was merely due to the difference in signature, That the dishonesty of the check was not a case, the role of the accused was one of guaranteeing and by signing the contract in the matter they were responsible for fulfilling their obligations under the aforesaid agreement. Gave evidence of the accused's dishonest intentions
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
