ABDUL GHANI versus ABDUL RASHID
Housing Partnerships, 43, & 44 and Civil 46 Code of Civil Procedure (v. 1908), OXL, appointed court housing to dissolve contributions and prepare reports on RI suit partnership firm accounts and assets. Was busy developing the scheme. The partnership was concerned, saying that no such account and configuration plan was created, despite repeatedly asking the defendants to prepare the firm's account, as it was possible for Nazir to create partnership accounts. The record does not show that the defendants in their written statement affirmed in the affidavit and evidence and in cross-examination that they were pursuing partnership business affairs as partners but that the admission and direction of the court Despite failing to send the account to the defendants, and despite the court's direction, they were partners as an administrative partner. The unsuccessful firm, the bank statement, failed to provide and present the account. De-Planning, Housing Scheme orders allotment of plots and allotment of plots in relation to the partnership firm and all accounts have been received but the managing partner failed to present all such accounts and documents fraudulently and fraudulently. On the other hand, under the circumstances, the office was ordered to prepare a final order in accordance with the terms of the OX, R 13, CPC and appointed Nazir as the recipient as well as the commissioner so that he could manage the business and achieve it. And recover all the assets of the immovable partnership unused land of the Housing Scheme (Partnership Business). Deceased defendants and partnership manag all assets and property firm
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for fresh advocates from Kohat lawyer