Find a Lawyer

AKHTAR MAHMOOD versus MUHAMMAD ASLAM

Section & ten 84 The tenant as the tenant records the matter up to the year 1988 1988 89 89 89 in dispute until the year 404040 41 at the request of the landlord at the request of the landlord. It was stated that the applicant was enjoying the tenant status at his own will and then in the case in which the applicant stated that the land was not recorded, the land in dispute with the consent of the respondents / owners. Occupying and receiving the tax at the rate at which it was to be paid by the owner. The respondent / owner was obliged to pay the land revenue. In the present case, the owner was doing so because of his relationship with the owner in the matter because the applicant's possession of the land in dispute was legal, after the court declared the applicant an unlawful occupation. Exclusion was absolutely wrong. Unpredictable orders were set aside. The possession of the land in dispute by the defendant owner was illegal which will be restored to the applicant. immigration advocates from Dijkot lawyer