COLONY SARHAD TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED versus MUHAMMAD ASLAM
AXXI, Rr 58 and 64 decree, objecting to the obligence of the property, asserts that the objectivist is the son of the decedent and the party also claims that such property was gifted to him by the creditor of the judgment. , Such property was transferred in its name only to avoid the implementation of the decree. The Observer claimed ownership of the enclosed property, which was his father's, and did not independently object to the demand for supply of O XXI, R 58, CPC. In order to consider the date of the first attachment after the good faith and title, the judge's petitioner had transferred the property fraudulently in favor of his son's objection to the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
ask a advocate free from Gujrat lawyer
