MUKHTAR ALI versus STATE
The convicts were convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment and fines for compromising the definitions of the Articles 302 (a) and 364 A / 109 evidence when they were compromised on the occasion of appeal filed by the accused against their conviction and conviction. In which the parties were charged and sentenced. Under section 230, & 364A and 109 PPC, of which the compound64 APP APC compound was not eligible, the State Council stated that the defendants had served more than ten years in prison and if Section 6464 The sentence was already reduced for non-compounded offenses under APP. , It would have no objection to the compromise between the parties in the case under section 230a (a), the PPC was accepted and the conviction was pronounced and the sentence pronounced, while section 6464 APP A. His sentence was retained under the PC, but his sentence was reduced to Rs. 50,000 already reduced to Rs.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Kasur lawyer