SIKANDAR versus STATE
Section 497 Police Order (22 of 2002), Article 18 (4) Control of the Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), Section 9 (C) bail, were not allegedly recovered from all pieces of the Grant Charset. The accused, but only 15 grams was taken as a sample and sent to the chemical analyst for 1000 grams of recovered substances treated as Section 9 (A) of the Drugs Substance Act. Can't be done. In the case of non-submission of section 497 (1) prohibition clause, which was brought to 1997, the CRP Complaints Investigation Officer investigated the matter in violation of the provisions of Article 18 (4), which was investigated. Did not belong to the navigation section. ) The police order, 2002, which appeared to have been suspected of causing serious suspicion, Malala misbehavingly, the accused was admitted on bail in the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Phagwar lawyer
