Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

SHAHRA KHAN versus THE STATE


Pre-Criminal Procedure for Criminal Code (CCPC) under Section 8 307, PPC

1968 P Cr. L J 339

[Lahore]

Before Faizullah Khan, J

SHAHRA KHAN‑‑Petitioner

versus

THE STATE‑Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 5005 of 1967, decided on 27th November 1967.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)------

----

S. 498‑Bail before arrest‑Complaint under S. 307, P. P. C.‑Question whether on facts offence fell under S. 307 or 324‑Cannot be considered by High Court‑Application for bail before arrest rejected.

Muhammad Aslam and others v. The State P L D 1967 S C 539 rel.

Sh. Abdur Rahman . Petitioner.

Qazi Ahmad Khan for A.‑G. for the State.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the State on the strength of the recent decision of the Supreme Court in Muhammad Aslam and others v. The State (PLD1967SC539) argued that since the case was at a preliminary stage and no evidence had been recorded, the High Court was not competent to make assessment of the medical evidence to form an opinion whether an offence under section 307 or 324, P. P. C., was constituted. In the authority referred to above, Muhammad Yaqub Ali, J. speaking for the Supreme Court, observed:

"Where there was direct evidence of the assault by the accused on deceased, what was the nature of the injuries caused by the appellants and whether they were collectively caused with the intention of causing death is for the trial Court to judge. The High Court was not competent to make an assessment of the medical evidence and form an opinion whether the offence committed by the accused fell under section 302 or 325, P. P. C. which presumably was the basis of the order granting bail."

2. The rule enunciated by the Supreme Court, in my view,' applies to a case where the High Court is to consider whether the offence would fall under section 307 or 324, P. P. C. I, therefore, cannot consider the question whether on the facts of the instant case an offence under section 324, P. P. C. has been constituted.

3. In the result, the application for bail before arrest is rejected.

Petition dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
jobs for fresh advocates from Khoski lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.