Find a Lawyer

NAZIR AHMAD ALIAS NAARAH versus STATE

Definitions of sections 2302 (b) and 9449 were immediately filed in the FIR, of which three of the accused were the present accused, while two others, who were shown unknown, were acquitted by the trial court. , There was no dispute between the account and the medical evidence. The presence of the deceased's wife, the most natural witness to the incident, could not be avoided by any means. He completely trapped the suspect in front of the police and at the time of the incident, the trial court was operating an electric bulb which was witnessed in the light of the witness bulb and the suspect was identified correctly, who was four months and 20 Day was arrested after the incident, escaped and proceeded under section 87/87/88, CRPC fully endorsed medical evidence, assuming the late widow's presence in the spot and ocular account, In which the accused were abducted for more than four months. The prosecution had, without any doubt, been able to prove its case against the accused, and the trial court's recorded sentence and sentence against the accused were fully maintained, the death sentence upheld, and the affirmative. The murder reference was answered. law firms from Pir Mahal lawyer