Find a Lawyer

MAJOR (RETD.) HAFEEZ AHMED versus STATE

Charges against sections 417 (2A) and 249 of a constitutional code (XLV of 1860), sections 406 and 420 against the accused respondent / accused, against whom the case was filed, were brought before the court. Appeal / Complainant's Statement Before the recording was made, the accused filed an application for his success under the trial under Section 249A, CRPC, which was filed Was acquitted and the accused acquitted of the complainant and the State Council lawyer, both jointly arguing that the trial court's order was premature in his face because Kevin The trial court did not provide the complainant with the opportunity to conduct a self-examination in court. The trial court had quickly disposed of the petition filed under Section 249A, CRPC and fixed the accused. Not that there is no barrier. The trial court was also empowered by the trial court to acquit the accused at any stage of the trial, denying the charge, if no allegation was made or the evidence was insufficient. Had to rely on its own facts, but the facts of the present case were not identical to those cases in which the court obtained the right to free the accused at any stage of the case because the case was contested because the complainant pursued his case. I was doing. And the court was ready to give evidence and the accused or his lawyer was ready to examine himself through the trial court, should not show rush in the circumstances. The courts were for both parties. 4f The accused sought treatment from the court. Was doing and po when you need a advocate from Jampur lawyer