PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH DEPUTY COMMISSIONER/COLLECTOR, SIALKOT versus MUHAMMAD SHAFI
Sections 18, 20, 22A & 50 (2) of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), OI, R10, to act as a party to the court in which the local authority was acquitted. Not issuing a notice to a local authority The dismissal of the application by the reference court on the basis that the local authority is not an essential party, but against the expulsion of the application may provide evidence for the determination of the value of the land by the local authority As a result, the court reverses the decision for reference when the review application is implemented. Landlords accuse the local court of rendering an unreasonable request by the landlord and the collector to act as a party to the appeal filed by the landlord and the collector against the decision of the reference court fixed by the reference court. What was, however, according to the collector, was that whatever compensation was finally determined by the superior to be reasonable and reasonable, the burden would be on the local authority to enforce the local authority as a party and the reference court. The source did not initially give notice to the local authority hearing the matter Went and had no opportunity to file cross-objections and was not allowed to appear and present evidence when the court of reference was set aside by the High Court. After providing full opportunity to the parties, the decision was made by the reference court to dispute the decision.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
