SALAHUDDIN versus MST. ZOHRA BEGUM
Sections 12 (2), XXIII, R 3 and O XXXIL R 7 (1 A) Sections 12 of the Applicable Agreement of the Applicants for the specific performance of the sales contract, (Application granted under) 2), to set aside the decree of such agreement, the CPC, through the decree decree, surrenders to the suit property owned by her husband in favor of the first respondents. Was placed as a guardian ad for the minor defendant without notice to Nazir and no procedure was completed under it. A. XXXII, R 7 (1A), the decree of the CPC agreement was obtained without the protection of the interests of the minor defendants, which was passed before the settlement agreement was entered into, to settle the matter. Prior to the settlement agreement was approved. The position passed in the case of the applicants was working. The decree was obtained by hiding the material facts from the court. It was fraudulent to hide the facts. It would be sufficient to make the decision of the party itself. The premium cannot be paid for concealment. Its settlement was set aside in circumstances \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
divorce advocates from Panjgur lawyer