Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASIF versus STATE

Clauses 242424, 7 337a (ii) and (iv) The value of the evidence was being investigated in a mental matter and it was in critical condition. The victim's testimony from the other injured prosecutor stated that she suffered three injuries, two on her head and one with a sharp weapon on her ear. The witnesses, who were recovered from both the accused's eyes, as the star witness of the case, fully supported the prosecution's case, in which to make false accusations against the accused or to impose any wrongdoing, There was no law point raised against the accused to guarantee interference in the two judgments, which were found in harmony with the earlier courts. The two victims had fully attracted the provisions of the law in connection with the injuries received from both the prosecution's witnesses and the accused, under which the trial court convicted the accused and acquitted the two accomplices. Was declared and to no avail. Take advantage of the accused because the lower courts applied the principle of hunger stripping The High Court directed that all executions be abolished, in addition to the benefit of Section 382B, CR PC given to the accused. Will run power of attorney advocate Tando Mohd Khan lawyer