Find a Lawyer

RIAZ AHMED versus PRESIDENT, NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN

Article 212 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O. VII, R 11 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 2A Damage suit Plaintiff's bank rejection where the appellant was appointed warehouse keeper in another bank Was merged, the services appellant stated that the appellant's service was not included in the bank from 21 11 1972 to 20 6 1974 before the bank appellant completed 25 years of service, the entire emolument due to the appellant T paid was not paid and had to be appealed for. In the light of the judgment and the judgment of the prosecution in the High Court, the Service Tribunal and the Supreme Court, one appellant continued to pay the respondents the remainder of the property attributed to Malala, the appellant was liable for damages. In his written statement filed by the defendants, his main objection was that the civil court had jurisdiction over his claim for damages on various counts. Is prohibited under Article 1212 of the Constitution and the defendants filed a separate application under Oli VI, R 11, CPC, which was rejected, the appellant filed an appeal against the order of rejection. ? Respondents acknowledged that the claim for damages was related to the Terms of Service. This was acknowledged only by the service tribunal. For this reason, the appellant was claiming legitimate damages because of the respondents' actions, the appellant was forced to resort to litigation and also sought compensation for the delay, in the circumstances, Could not be treated. Under Section 2A of the Service Tribunals Act, 1973, the employee is not determining its terms and conditions. immigration advocates phone number from Phoolnagar (Bhai Pheru) lawyer