M.A. NOS.443/LB TO 447/LB OF 2006, DECIDED ON 1ST DECEMBER, 2006. versus M.A. NOS.443/LB TO 447/LB OF 2006, DECIDED ON 1ST DECEMBER, 2006.
Section 3535 (()) adjudicating the appeal through the appellate tribunal case was adjourned by the clerk / ministerial staff of the court. Appeals were excluded by default for failure to present a diagnosis in the postponement date, when the injunction was not granted, hearing the case adjourned. By the clerk of the court / ministerial staff, it was not the date set by the court itself, so the various petitions were accepted and the order was withdrawn, under which the appeal for hearing of the case was dismissed for non-prosecution. Done. Appeals will be rescheduled and re-heard on merit by the Appellate Tribunal.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous lower court advocate from Babri Banda lawyer