FAUZIA QURESHI AND ANOTHER versus REGISTRAR, LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE
The Preamble Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) was granted by the Supreme Court, however, on the grounds that the disallowed order and action were both illegal and the High Court could not approve it. ? The constitutional jurisdiction and whether the aforesaid orders violated the rules of natural justice and were reported to the affected and interested parties without notice. Whether the demolition and reconstruction of the High Court building's western wing was illegal and in violation of the Punjab Special Premises Ordinance 1985, and that the demolition and reconstruction justification could be justified. Will serve the purpose. The High Court was more inclined and desirous of maintaining the old architectural beauty of the building and whether the provincial communications and construction department applicant had done so by not participating in the proceedings before the High Court, the file filed The 43-day delay in hearing the plea in the broader interest of justice, all the conditions for continuing the injunction are available, the respondents were instructed to retain status till the appeal decision. \ R \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
patent advocate from Utror lawyer