Find a Lawyer

ABDUL MAJID versus MASHKOOR AHMED

Article 15 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Petition Important Resolution Evacuation Procedure Individual Requirement of the Home Needs Effective The landlord sought to evict the applicant on the basis of his personal unreasonable need. can go. On the basis of the evidence, both parties had guided the evidence in support of their conviction, and after thorough consideration and consideration of the evidence, the two courts concluded that the defendant had committed his personal error. In the queries for the premises the issue was needed. The High Court, in exercising its constitutional jurisdiction, did not need to interfere with the question of fact as well as evidence based on disputed questions of fact even if such findings were wrong.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013

• MUHAMMAD RAFIQ v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary 2013 CLD 1667
• MUHAMMAD TARIQ v. Malik BASHIR-UD-DIN 2013 CLC 1669
• MEGA CURRENCY EXCHANGE COMPANY (PVT.) LTD. v. MANAGER COMMERCIAL SENIOR, C.A.A. 2013 MLD 1670
• Dr. ABDUL RAUF v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Interior Secretary 2013 PCrLJ 1671
• MUHAMMAD RAFIQ v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Law and Parliamentary Affairs 2013 CLC 1679
• MUHAMMAD AFTAB v. State 2013 YLR 1680
• UMEED v. State 2013 YLR 1687
• KARACHI COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETIES UNION LTD. v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Chief Secretary 2013 CLC 1691

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2013 →

family advocate from Kot Bunglow lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes