Find a Lawyer

JAVED AKHTAR versus STATE

Sections 302 (b), 324 and 336 of the evidence were held in light of the circumstances and in this case the FIR was lodged with a proper miracle, specifically designating the accused as the main culprit. Was the one who killed and killed the murderer. By consistently and effectively firing at others, the complainant and the other prosecutor's witness provided an ocular account of the incident before the trial court, both of which said that the witnesses were closely related to the deceased and the injured person, The witnesses were there because of the incident. The prosecution witness's seal was sealed in his home premises to confirm his presence at the relevant time. Witnesses said eyewitnesses made permanent statements to the trial court about the main incident and the suspect's involvement. The statements made by the eyewitnesses in connection with the main events not only affected the trust, but it also affected the court in its authenticity and integrity. During the investigation, six crime vacancies were secured from six incidents. A 30-bore pistol was also recovered from the possession of the suspect's Franz Science Laboratory. The six empty documents of the crime were similar to the pistols recovered from the possession of the accused ocular account. In these circumstances the receipts helped greatly, the medical evidence also provided substantial support to the ion record, as its history And there were times when witnesses described the incident, the use of weapons and the location of the injuries, all of which were confirmed by medical evidence, the prosecution in the case of motions. how to become a advocate from Tall lawyer