Find a Lawyer

MISS SABIRA B. NANJIANI, KARACHI versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SALARY CIRCLE-03, ZONE-D, KARACHI

References to the submission of wealth statements to the High Court where sections 57, 58 and 136 were filed under sub-section (2) of section 58 of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 and section 5 (1) of the said section. Not under this, Asoudi had the right to submit his revised wealth statements within the parameters of section 557 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, as the provisions of section 58 (2) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, were general in nature. The special provisions of section 57 of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 cannot be ruled out. It was also misunderstood because section 57 (2) had no effect on section 57, but it did not have the right to file the amended wealth statement until the wealth statement filed in this case The application was expanded when lawmakers, according to their discretion, classified the assessment into two categories. Submission of wealth statements under Sections 58 (l) and 58 (2) of the Income Ordinance extended the benefit of 1979 to a reviewer's category, in clear and unambiguous terms under section 58 (2). Could not benefit from filing an upcoming modified wealth statement. They should be denied because such an advantage was not available to the other class or it would produce an unbalanced conclusion that would be open to objection to legal principles. The interpretation of the two provisions of the Income Tax Ordinance, newly entered in 1979. Sub-document supported was (2) of section 588, which showed that in this illegal order a notice of deficiency / lacuna was taken by the tribunal in this law, on the subsequent stock lawmakers. Take care of them. e and, consequently, a new subsection family advocate from Khushal Kot lawyer