AHMAD YAR versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, CHINIOT, DISTRICT JHANG
Section 17 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), AXLI, R22 The trial court for the recovery of articles relating to the ex-wife by her ex-husband was heard by the trial court as well as the first appellate court against the husband. Appeal was not filed under section 17, West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964, on appeal filed under Lady Effect, but no clause of CPC was applied except for sections 10 and 11, but Family Court. This action was applied before the cross objection was filed, but the order was issued. OCLI, a purely CPCP case in R22, was not capable of proceedings under the husband of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964, but it will be deemed that he has not filed any appeal before the First Appellate Court. And it will be understood. Has accepted the trial court's decree
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Kot Mithan lawyer