Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

AHMAD YAR versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, CHINIOT, DISTRICT JHANG


Section 17 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), AXLI, R22 The trial court for the recovery of articles relating to the ex-wife by her ex-husband was heard by the trial court as well as the first appellate court against the husband. Appeal was not filed under section 17, West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964, on appeal filed under Lady Effect, but no clause of CPC was applied except for sections 10 and 11, but Family Court. This action was applied before the cross objection was filed, but the order was issued. OCLI, a purely CPCP case in R22, was not capable of proceedings under the husband of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964, but it will be deemed that he has not filed any appeal before the First Appellate Court. And it will be understood. Has accepted the trial court's decree

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best advocate from Kot Mithan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.