MUHAMMAD RIZWAN YOUSUF versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, MULTAN
The suit for dissolution of the marriage on the basis of the open door mentioned in section 5, schedule and section 10 (4) of the marriage was Rs. 500, but in column 13 the plot of land given by the defendant to the plaintiff as the robber was given by the defendant. Ali's father was not mentioned by a cell deed registered by him. The plaintiff claimed that the plaintiff's family court, with the condition of the return of the plot, claimed that the plaintiff would return the plot to the appellate court, but a condition like plot was made for nomination in column 13 of the agreement. In the Memorandum of Appeal, the plaintiff contends that as a plaintiff, her father had been plotted as a doevir instead of the plaintiff, the family court ruled that fact with the condition, the High Court appealed. Accepted, restored the decision by setting aside the uncontested decision. Family Court \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Sanjwal lawyer