MST. ASIA LATIF versus TARIQ MUHAMMAD KHAN
Section 54 and the Contract 54 Contract Act (72 of 18, of IX), Section 17 transfer on the basis of a contract of sale purchased by him through fraud, because the original owner died at the relevant time. Neither can the owner's legal inheritance be altered in his favor. For more than twenty years, neither the right to inherit the property nor the claim of ownership and property rights had been made by the legal heirs to the proprietor by virtue of such conduct. And represent that he has been given the title and he is entitled to make a legal statement. The heirs did not bring their names on the record of the taxes, and persuaded the innocent buyers to buy the suit property if the extraordinary owner committed fraud in their favor through a counterfeit and the legal heirs. Would have a right against such owner and not the seller, who had no evidence that he had committed fraud or had real knowledge of the sale to the unusual owner. The legal agreement was invalid and the legal heirs could not be allowed to defeat the title of buyer suit later.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Killa Saifullah lawyer